Articulating Media Arts Activities in Art-Science Contexts





Author(s):




Exhibition:


SIGGRAPH 2015: Hybrid Craft

Category:


Paper

Abstract/Summary/Introduction:

This paper discusses the conflicting expectations for media artists taking part in art-science collaborations. Despite the increasing opportunity to participate in these interdisciplinary projects, it can be unclear how media arts activities are best articulated, or even if they need to be defined at all. Additionally, this paper examines a methodological framework widely used in the visualization community for identifying different visualization tasks within research activities. Inspired by its success, this paper proposes a new methodological framework for media arts activities in art-science contexts. This framework splits media arts activities into overlapping areas: generation, augmentation, provocation and mediation, providing a useful way to articulate the broader importance of media arts in interdisciplinary collaboration.

[View PDF]

References:

1. R. Malina, “Is Art-Science Hogwash?: A Rebuttal to Jean-Marc Levy Leblond,” Leonardo, Vol. 39, No. 1, 66–67 (2012).

2. R. Malina, “Non-Euclidian Translation: Crossing the River Delta from the Arts to the Sciences and Back Again,” Leonardo Reviews Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 3, 6–8 (2011).

3. B. Shneiderman, “Creativity Support Tools: Accelerating Discovery and Innovation,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50, No. 12, 20–32 (2007).

4. L. Candy, “New Media Arts and the Future of Technologies,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50, No. 12, 30–31 (2007).

5. Z. Bilda, E. Edmonds, and L. Candy, “Designing for Creative Engagement,” Design Studies, Vol. 29, No. 6, 525–540 (2008).

6. P. Jennings and E. Giaccardi, “Creativity Support Tools for and by the New Media Arts Community,” NSF Workshop Report on Creativity Support Tools, 37–52 (2005).

7. E. Shanken, “Artists in Industry and the Academy: Collaborative Research, Interdisciplinary Scholarship and the Creation and Interpretation of Hybrid Forms,” Leonardo, Vol. 38, No. 5, 415–418 (2005).

8. T. Munzner, “Process and Pitfalls in Writing Information Visualization Research Papers,” in Information Visualization (Berlin: Springer, 2008) pp. 134–153.

9. C. Ware, Information Visualization: Perception for Design (Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013).

10. T. Munzner, “A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 15, No. 6, 921–928 (2009).

11. A. G. Forbes, “Media Arts Roles in Art-Science Collaborations,” Proceedings of the Re-new Digital Arts Festival, 276–282 (2013).

12. G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987). Translated by B. Massumi.

13. R. Katz and T. J. Allen, “Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) Syndrome: A Look at the Performance, Tenure, and Communication Patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups,” R&D Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 7–20 (1982).

14. R. Jones, “The Post-Critical Hybrid,” Artnodes, Vol. 11 (2011).

15. A. Gutmann and D. Thompson, Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).

16. V. A. Brown, “Collective Inquiry and Its Wicked Problems,” in Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination (London: Earthscan, 2010) pp. 61–83.

17. V. Vesna, “Toward a Third Culture: Being in Between,” Leonardo, Vol. 34, No. 2, 121–125 (2001).

18. A. G. Forbes, “Media Arts Roles in Art-Science Collaborations,” Proceedings of the Re-new Digital Arts Festival, 276–282 (2013).

19. A. G. Forbes, T. Höllerer and G. Legrady, “Behaviorism: A Framework for Dynamic Data Visualization,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1164–1171 (2010).

20. A. G. Forbes, T. Höllerer and G. Legrady, “Generative Fluid Profiles for Interactive Media Arts Projects,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, 37–43 (2013).

21. A. G. Forbes and K. Odai, “Iterative Synaesthetic Composing with Multimedia Signals,” Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 573–578 (2012).

22. A. G. Forbes, J. Villegas, K. Almryde and E. Plante, “A Stereoscopic System for Viewing the Temporal Evolution of Brain Activity Clusters in Response to Linguistic Stimuli,” Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV, Vol. 9011, 90110I–1–7 (2014).

23. J. Villegas and A. G. Forbes, “Analysis/Synthesis Approaches for Creatively Processing Video Signals,“ Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 37–46 (2014).