Interface as Image: Image Making and Mixed Reality





Author(s):




Exhibition:


SIGGRAPH 2004: Synaesthesia

Category:


Essay

Abstract/Summary/Introduction:

This paper will explore the use of the graphical user interface as art, product and inspiration, drawing on my own practice as a digital image maker and installation artist, and a theoretical investigation of digital image making in hybrid art practice. As the boundaries and reference points between physical and digitally grounded imagery become less defined, the possible duality and interplay for a com­ bined image space moves towards a seamless self-referencing and continuous activity. A visual feedback loop or strip, where the clues of originality become increasingly hard to differentiate and, perhaps, increasingly irrelevant, a state of “deterritorialisation.”1 Some thought will be given to examining the potential for mapping digitally ground­ ed imagery into both two- and three-dimensional physical space to create a mixed-reality experience and to what can happen when we extract the real-world metaphors from the digital environment and take them back into the physical world. Questions about the trans­ parency of the human/computer interface, and about just how trans­ parent we really want this to be, are also raised. What are we left with when we remove the content from the graphical user interface? What traces of human interaction (from the physical) become evident, and what are the “aid memoirs” we employ to assist us in navigation and colonization of the digital landscape?

[View PDF]

References:

Bal, M. (2003). Is visual culture a good idea? Lecture,Art Gallery of New South Wales.
Bolter, J.D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: understanding new media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Bolter, J.D. & Gromala, D. (2003). dows and mirrors: Interaction design, digital a and the myth of transparency. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Grau, 0. (2003) Virtual art: From i usion to immersion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Heim, M. (1991). The metaphysics of vi ual reality. In Helsel S. K. & Roth, J.P. (Eds.). Virtual Reality Theory, Practice and Promise, (pp. 27-34). London: Meckler Publishing.
Levy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the virtual age. New York: Plenum Press.

Lovejoy, M. (1997). Postmode currents – Art and artists in the age of electronic media. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Moser, M.A. (1996). Nature morte: Landscape and narrative in virtual environments. In Moser, M.A. & Macleod, D. (Eds.). Immersed in Technology Art and Virtual Envi nments. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Pepperell, R. & Punt, M. (2000). The postdigital membrane: Imagination, technology and desire. UK: Intellect Books.
Slouka, M. (1995). War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on realit New York: BasicBooks.
Tofts, D, Jonson,A. & Cavallaro,A. (Eds.). (2002). Prefiguring cyber­ culture: An intellectual histor Sydney: Power Publications, University of Sydney.
Woolley, B. (1992). Virtual worlds: A jou ey into hype and hype eality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Keywords:


augmented realities, digital image making, Hybrid practices