The Pleasures of Immersion and Engagement: Schemas, Scripts, and the Fifth Business

• J. Yellowlees Douglas
• Andrew Hargadon

• SIGGRAPH 2001: n-space

Category:

• Paper

• Presently, designers of interactive narratives and video games have only a slender understanding of the aesthetic experiences their audiences and users seek. Using schema theory, this study articulates the two varieties of aesthetic pleasures that users of interactive works enjoy: immersion and engagement. It uses schema theory to define the characteristics of immersion and engagement in both conventional and new media. After examining how readers’ experiences of these two different aesthetics may be enhanced or diminished by interface design, options for navigation, and other features, the essay concludes by looking beyond immersion and engagement to “flow,” a state in which readers are both immersed and engaged.

  It must be granted that there is some value in mystification, labyrinth, or surprise in the environment… This is so, however, only under two conditions. First, there must be no danger of losing basic form or orientation, of never coming out. The surprise must occur in an overall framework; the confusions must be small regions in a visible whole. Furthermore, the labyrinth or mystery must in itself have some form that can be explored and in time apprehended. Complete chaos without hint of connection is never pleasurable. – Kevin Lynch, The Image of the City⁵⁷

  Those roles which, being neither those of Hero nor Heroine, Confidante nor Villain, but which were nonetheless essential to bring about the recognition or the denouement, were called the Fifth Business in drama and opera companies organized according to the old style; the player who acted these parts was often referred to as Fifth Business. – Robertson Davies, The Fifth Business: The Deptford Trilogy²²

• [View PDF]

• References
  1. Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

  2. Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

  3. Beaugrande, R. (1980). Text, discourse, and process: Toward a multidiscip!i11ary science of texts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1980.

  4. Beaugrande, R. & Colby, B. (1979), Narrative models of action and interaction, Cognitive Science 3 (1979), 43-66.

  5. Bernstein, M. (1991). The navigation problem reconsidered. In Hypertext/hypermedia handbook. Eds. Emily Berk and Joseph Devlin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991, 285-298.

  6. Bernstein, M., Joyce, M., & Levine, D. (1992). Contours of Constructive Hypertext, European Conference on Hypermedia Technology, 1992. Milano: Association for Computing Machinery, 1992, 161-170.

  7. Bernstein, M. Span of attention. HypertextNow. Watertown,MA: EastgateSystems.: www.eastgate.com/HypertextNow//archives/Baseball.html

  8. Bernstein, M. Patterm, narrative, and baseball. HypertextNow. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems: www.eastgate.com/HypertextNow//archives/ Attention.html.

  9. Bernstein, M. Chasing Our Tails. Composition@Chorus: wwwwriting.berkeley. ed u/chorus/com position/be rnstein/structu re. h tm I>.

  10. Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Boston: Faber & Faber, 1994.

  11. Bolter, J. & Grusin, R. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

  12. Brand, S. (1987). The Media lab: Inventing the future at MIT New York: Viking, 1987.

  13. Britton, B.K., (1978), Reading and cognitive capacity u.wge: Adjunct question effects. Memory and Cognition, 6, 266-273.

  14. Brown-Martin, G. (1999). Hooray for Hollywood. NextGe11 2 (2), 94-101.

  15. Bruner,). (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.

  16. Coleridge, S. T. Biographia literaria. In Critical theory since plato. Ed. Hazard Adams. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1971, 468-473.

  17. Coover, R. (1992). The end of books. New York Times Book Review (June 21, 1992): I, 23-24.

  18. Coover, R., ed. Hypertext Hotel: duke.cs.brown.edu:8888/

  19. Coover, R. (1969). Prickso11gs and descants. New York: Plume, 1969.

  20. Cowie, P. (1990). Coppola. London: Faber and Faber, 1990.

  21. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper, 1990.

  22. Davies, R. (1983). Fifth business: The deptford trilogy. New York: Penguin, 1983.

  23. Douglas. J. Y. (1999). The end of books- or books without end? Reading interactive narratives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, I 999.

  24. Douglas, J. Y. (1994). I have said nothing. Eastgate Quarterly Review 1,(2).

  25. Douglas, J. Y. (1991). Understanding the act of reading: The WOE beginners guide to dissection. Writing on the edge 2, (2), 112-126.

  26. Douglas, J. Y. (1998). Wandering through the labyrinth: Encountering interactive fiction. Computerf and composition 6, (3), 93-103.

  27. Edward, D. M. & Hardman, L. (1990). Lost in hyperspace: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment,. In Hypertext: The01y into practice, ed. Ray McAleese. Oxford: Intellect Books, 1990, I 05-125.

  28. Eliot, T.S. (1964). The wasteland. Selected poems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1964.

  29. Ford, F. M. (1990). The good soldier: A tale of passion. 1915. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

  30. Frank, J. (1988). Spatial form in modern literature. ln Essemials of the theory offi ction, Eds. Michael Hoffman and Patrick Murphy. Durham: Duke University Press, 1988, 85-100

  31. Gianetti, L. (1990). Understanding movies. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.

  32. Gilligan, S. (1993). Who killed Sam Rupert? Virtual murder 1. Portland, OR: Creative Multimedia Corporation, 1993.

  33. Gilligan, S. (1993). The magic death. Virtual murder 2. Portland, OR: Creative Multimedia Corporation, 1993.

  34. Gilligan, S. (1995). Who killed Brett Penance? The environmental su1fe1; murder mystery 3. Portland, OR: Creative Multimedia Corporation, 1995.

  35. Gilligan, S. (1995). Who killed Taylor French? The case of the undressed reporte1; murder myste,y 4. Portland, OR: Creative Multimedia Corporation, 1995.

  36. Gombrich, E.H (1956). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956.

  37. “Grim Fandango,” Fremont, CA: LucasArts Entertainment, 1998.

  38. Groden, M. (1977). Ulysses in progress. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.

  39. Harpold, T. (1991). T hrenody: Psychoanalytic digressions on the subject of hypertexts. In Hypermedia and literary criticism. Eds. Paul Delany and George Landow. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

  40. Hargadon, A. and Douglas, J.Y. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Unpublished manuscript.

  41. Hurtig, B. (1998). The plot thickens. New Media. January 13, 1998.

  42. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theo,y of response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.

  43. Jackson, S. (1996). Patchwork girl: by Mary/Shelley/and herself Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1996.

  44. Joyce, J. Anna Livia Plurabelle: The making of a chapter. Ed. Fred H. Higginson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1960.

  45. Joyce, J. Ulysses. New York: V intage, 1980.

  46. Joyce, M. Afternoon: A ,·to,y. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1990.

  47. Joyce, M. (1997). Nonce upon some times: Rereading hypertext fiction, Modern Fiction Studies 43, (3), 579-597.

  48. Joyce, M. (1995). OJ two minds: Hypertext pedagogy and poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.

  49. Joyce, M. (1998). Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts, Academic Computing 3, (4) (November 1988), 37-42.

  50. Joyce, M. Twelve blue: www.eastgate.com/Twelve8lue/

  51. Landow, G. P. (1992). The Dickens Web. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1992.

  52. Landow, G. P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contempora,y critical theo,y and technology. 2nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997,

  53. Langer, S. (1953). Feeling and f01m. New York: Scribner, 1953.

  54. Larsen, D. (1994). Marble springs. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1994.

  55. Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1991.

  56. Longest journey. New York, Funcom, 2000.

  57. Lynch, K. (196). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.

  58. Lyne, A., director. “Jacob’s Ladder,” New Line Cinema, 1990.

  59. Marshall, C. C. & Shipman, F. M .. Searching for the missing link: Discovering implicit structure in spatial hypertext. Hypertext 93: www.csdl.camu.edu/-shipman/ ht93-paperlht93-paper.htm1

  60. McDaid, J. (1992). Uncle Buddy’s phantom funhouse. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1992.

  61. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Signet, 1964.

  62. Mechner, J. (1997). The Last Erpress. Novato, CA: Broderbund, 1997.

  63. Miller, L. www.claptrap.com, New York Times Book Review, August 29, 1998: 43. Electronic Art and Animation Catalog

  64. Miller, R. and Miller, R. (1993). “Myst.” Novato, CA: Broderbund, 1993.

  65. Moulthrop, S. (1989). Hypertext and “the hyperreal.” Hypertext 89 Proceedings, Baltimore, 1989, 259-267.

  66. Moulthrop, S. (1991). Toward a paradigm for reading hypertexts: Making notl1- ing happen in hypermedia fiction. In Hypertextlhype,media handbook, Eds. Emily Berk and Joseph Devlin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991, 65-78.

  67. Moulthrop, S. (1991). Victory garden. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1991.

  68. Moulthrop, S. (1997). Where to? A review of forward anywhere by Cathy Marshall and Judy Malloy, Convergence: The journal of research into new media technologies, 1997, [pp.]

  69. Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of nan-ative in cyberspace. New York: The Free Press, 1997.

  70. Nell, V. ( 1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.

  71. Paul, C. (1995). Unreal city: A reader’s companion to The Wasteland. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1995.

  72. Rapoport, A. & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.

  73. Robbe-Grillet, A. (1959). In the labyrinth. Trans. Christine Brooke-Rose. London: John Calder, 1959.

  74. Rosenberg, J. (1996). The structure of hypertext activity. Proceedings of Hypertext 96: www.cs.unc.edu/-barman/HT96/P l 7/SHA_out.html

  75. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memo,y: A theo,y of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

  76. Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribners, 1990.

  77. Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scnj,ts, plans, goals and understanding: An inqui,y into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.

  78. “Shenmue.” Tokyo: Sega Dreamcast, 2001.

  79. Shono, H. (1994). Gadget: invention, travel, and adventure. Synergy, 1994.

  80. Sierra Studios Online Survey. August 25, 1999: www.sierrastudios.com/contentsurvey. html.

  81. States, 8. 0. (1993). Dreaming and st01ytelling. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.

  82. Strickland, S. (1997). True north. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1997.

  83. “Sydney 2000.” London: Eidos, 2000.

  84. “Titanic: Adventure out of Time.” Knoxville: CyberAix, 1996.

  85. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984.

  86. van Dijk, T. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplina,y study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.

  87. Wolff, A., (1996). Obsidian. Segasoft, 1996.

  88. Woolf, V. (1925). Mrs. Dalloway. 1925. London: Grafton Books, 1976.

Keywords:

• schema
• video games